Volume 2, Issue 2 (6-2020)
JAD 2020, 2(2): 36-55 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Batuwita S, Udugampala S, Edirisinghe U. Description of a new species of Eutropis (Sauria: Scincidae) from the Central Hills of Sri Lanka with the resurrection of Eutropis lankae (Deraniyagala). JAD 2020; 2 (2) :36-55
URL: http://jad.lu.ac.ir/article-1-79-en.html
URL: http://jad.lu.ac.ir/article-1-79-en.html
1- The Society for the Biodiversity Conservation, 63/4, Adikaramwatta, Yaggahapitiya, Kandy, Sri Lanka , sudesh.batuwita@gmail.com
2- Wildlife Conservation Society- Galle, Hiyare Reservoir, Hiyare 80056, Galle, Sri Lanka
3- Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Old Galaha Road, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
2- Wildlife Conservation Society- Galle, Hiyare Reservoir, Hiyare 80056, Galle, Sri Lanka
3- Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Old Galaha Road, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
Abstract: (14709 Views)
We reviewed the species referred to Eutropis carinata complex from Sri Lanka. We provided the data on the lectotype of Eutropis carinata along with a discussion on its synonyms. Examination of the lectotype of Sincus carinatus Schneider, 1801 (= Eutropis carinata), shows this taxon is not conspecific with Mabuya carinata lankae Deraniyagala, 1953 (= Eutropis carinata lankae). Therefore, we resurrected Eutropis lankae (Deraniyagala) as a valid species from Sri Lanka. Based on the available data, we here tentatively recognize Tiliqua rubriventris Hardwicke and Gray, 1829 (= Eutropis rubriventris) as a valid species. Also, a new species of the genus Eutropis Fitzinger is described from Sri Lanka. The new species was previously confused with E. carinata (Schneider) and may be the source of earlier records of E. beddomei (Jerdon) from the Central Hills of Sri Lanka. The new species, Eutropis resetarii sp. nov. differs from the lectotype of E. carinata by the following characters: widely (vs. narrowly) separated supranasal scales, first supraocular not in contact (vs. in contact) with frontal, third pair of chin shields separated slightly or not touching the second pair of chin shields (vs. in contact broadly with the second pair) and 30 (vs. 32) scale rows across the midbody. Eutropis resetarii sp. nov. is distinguished from E. lankae by the following characters: first loreal does not reach the dorsal surface of snout (vs. reaches in E. lankae); lower preocular larger (vs. smaller) than the anterior loreal scale; lateral border of postmental in complete contact with the first and the second (vs. first and partially the second) infralabials; third pair of chin shields not in contact or in narrow (vs. broad) contact with second pair of chin shields; palm and sole scales rounded, more or less juxtaposed (vs. tubercle-like imbricate scales); and having greater external ear opening size, 40–46% (vs. 23–38%) of eye diameter. Eutropis resetarii sp. nov. can be distinguished from all other congeners by a combination of the following characters: in having widely separated supranasals and prefrontals, lacking postnasals, prefrontals reaching lateral sides of snout, only the first supraocular in contact with frontal, six or seven supraciliaries, lower preocular as large as first loreal, two primary temporals, upper pretemporal smaller than lower and both touching parietals, parietals completely separated by interparietal; two post-supralabials, first and second pairs of chin shields separated by a single scale, third pair of chin shields not in contact or in narrow contact with second pair of chin shields; juxtaposed rounded palm and sole scales, comparatively robust digits, having greater external ear opening size (40–46% of eye diameter) and presence of 14–15 subdigital lamellae under 4th digit of pes. The new species has been recorded from the highest elevations (from ~1000 m to ~1600 m), while E. lankae has a wider distribution from coast to ~900 m. The distributional ranges of these two species are therefore allopatric.
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Subject:
Species Diversity
Received: 2020/05/21 | Accepted: 2020/07/30 | Published: 2020/08/18
Received: 2020/05/21 | Accepted: 2020/07/30 | Published: 2020/08/18
References
1. Amarasinghe, A. A. T., Campbell, P. D., Chandramouli, S. R., Deuti, K., Raha, S., Karunarathna, D. M. S. S. and Ineich, I. (2016a). Taxonomy and natural history of Eutropis beddomei (Jerdon, 1870) (Reptilia: Scincidae), including a redescription of the holotype. Zootaxa, 4132 (4): 509–520. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4132.4.3 [DOI]
2. Amarasinghe A. A. T., Campbell, P. D., Chandramouli, S. R., Deuti, K., Raha, S., Karunarathna, D. M. S. S. and Ineich, I. (2016b). Taxonomy of two endemic Indian skinks, Eutropis bibronii (Gray, 1838) and E. nagarjunensis (Sharma, 1969) (Reptilia: Scincidae), including redescriptions of their types. Zootaxa, 4154 (2): 155–168. http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4154.2.3 [DOI]
3. Amarasinghe, A. A. T., Poyarkov, Jr N. A., Campbell, P. D., Leo, S., Supriatna, J. and Hallermann, J. (2017). Systematics of Eutropis rugifera (Stoliczka, 1870) (Squamata: Scincidae) including the redescription of the holotype. Zootaxa, 4272 (1): 103–118. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4272.1.5 [DOI]
4. Amarasinghe, A. A. T., Thammachoti, P., Campbell, P. D., Hallermann, J., Henkanaththegedara, S. M., Karunarathna, D. M. S. S., Riyanto, A., Smith, E. N. and Ineich, I. (2018). Systematic composition of the Eutropis multifasciata (Kuhl, 1820) species complex (Squamata: Scincidae) and designation of a neotype. Herpetologica, 74 (4): 342–354.
5. Annandale, N. (1909). Report on a small collection of lizards from Travancore. Records of the Indian Museum, 3 (2): 253–257.
6. Anonymous (1835). Memoirs of General and Flag Officers Recently Deceased: The Late Major-General Thomas Hardwicke, H.E.I.C. Service. The United Service Journal and Naval and Military Magazine, 1835 (1): 529–530.
7. Ashton, M. S., Gunatilleke, S., de Zoysa, N., Dassanayake, M. D., Gunatilleke, N. and Wijesundera, S. (1997). A field guide to the common trees and shrubs of Sri Lanka. WHT Publications (Pvt.) Ltd, Colombo, Sri Lanka. 432 pp.
8. Batuwita, S. (2016). Description of two new species of Eutropis (Reptilia: Scincidae) from Sri Lanka with a redescription of Eutropis madaraszi (Méhely). Journal of Herpetology, 50 (3): 486–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/15-093 [DOI]
9. Batuwita, S. (2019). A review of the lizards of the endemic genus Lankascincus (Reptilia: Scincidae: Lygosominae) from Sri Lanka. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, 162 (3): 211–262. https://doi.org/10.3099/MCZ38.1 [DOI]
10. Batuwita, S. and Edirisinghe, U. (2017). Nessia gansi: a second three-toed snake-skink (Reptilia: Squamata: Scindidae) from Sri Lanka with the designation of a neotype for Nessia burtonii Gray. Travaux du Muśeum National d’Histoire Naturelle ‘Grigore Antipa’, 60 (1): 377–388.
11. Bauer, A. M. (1998). South Asian herpetological specimens of historical note in the Zoological Museum, Berlin. Hamadryad, 23: 133–149.
12. Blanford, W. T. (1870). Notes on some Reptilia and Amphibia from Central India. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 39 (4): 335–376.
13. Blanford, W. T. (1879). Notes on a collection of reptiles and frogs from the neighborhood of Ellore and Dumagudem. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 48: 109–116.
14. Blyth, E. (1853). Notices and descriptions of various reptiles, new or little known. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, 22 (1–7): 639–655.
15. Bossuyt, F., Meegaskumbura, M., Beenaerts, N., Gower, D. J., Pethiyagoda, R., Roelants, K., Mannaert, A., Wilkinson, M., Bahir, M. M., Manamendra-Arachchi, K., Ng, P. K. L., Schneider, C. J., Oommen, O. V. and Milinkovitch, M. C. (2004). Local endemism within the Western Ghats-Sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot. Science, 306 (5695): 479–481. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100167 [DOI]
16. Boulenger, G. E. (1887). Catalogue of the lizards in the British Museum (Natural History), 3, Lacertidae, Gerrhosauridae, Scincidae, Anelytropsidae, Dibamidae, Chamaeleontidae. British Museum (Natural History), London. 575 pp.
17. Boulenger, G. E. (1890). Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Batrachia. Taylor and Francis, London. 541 pp.
18. Das, I., Dattagupta, B. and Gayen, N. C. (1998). History and catalogue of reptile types in the collection of the Zoological Survey of India. Journal of South Asian Natural History, 3 (2): 121–172.
19. Das, I., de Silva, A. and Austin, C. C. (2008). A new species of Eutropis (Squamata: Scincidae) from Sri Lanka. Zootaxa, 1700: 35–52.
20. Datta-Roy, A., Singh, M., Srinivasulu, C. and Karanth, K.P. (2012). Phylogeny of the Asian Eutropis (Squamata: Scincidae) reveals an ‘into India’ endemic Indian radiation. Molecular, Phylogenetics and Evolution, 63: 817–824.
21. Deraniyagala, P. E. P. (1931). Some Ceylon lizards. Ceylon Journal of Science (Section B), 16 (2): 139–180.
22. Deraniyagala, P. E. P. (1953). A Colored Atlas of Some Vertebrates from Ceylon. Tetrapod Reptilia, 2. National Museum, Colombo. 101 pp.
23. Dumeŕil, A. M. C. and Bibron, G. (1839) Erpétologie générale ou historie naturelle complète des reptiles. Volume 5. Roret, Paris. 855 pp. [In French]
24. Gray, J. E. (1845). Catalogue of the Specimens of Lizards in the Collection of the British Museum. Printed by order of the trustees, London. 289 pp.
25. Gray, J. E. (1846). Descriptions of some new species of Indian lizards. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 18 (Series 1): 116–122.
26. Günther, A. C. L. G. (1864). The Reptiles of British India. Arment Biological Press, Landisville, PA. 452 pp.
27. Günther, A. C. L. G. (1875). Second report on collections of Indian reptiles obtained by the British Museum. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1875: 224–234.
28. Hardwicke, F. R. and Gray, J. E. (1827). A synopsis of the species of saurian reptiles, collected in India by Major-General Hardwicke. Journal of Zoology, London, 3: 214–229.
29. Hardwicke, F. R. and Gray, J. E. (1829) [1833–1835]. Illustrations of Indian Zoology, chiefly selected from the collection of Major-General Hardwicke, FRS, Volume 2. Adolphus Richter and Co., and Parbury, Allen and Co., London. 320 pp. https://archive.org/details/IllustrationsOfIndianZoology2/page/n7/mode/2up
30. Inger, R. F., Shaffer, H. B., Koshy, M. and Bakde, R. (1984). A report on a collection of amphibians and reptiles from Ponmudi, Kerala, South India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 81 (3): 551–570.
31. Jerdon, T. C. (1853). Catalogue of reptiles inhabiting the peninsula of India. Journal of the Asiatic Society Bengal, 22 (5): 462–479.
32. Kanishka, S. A., Danushka, A. D. and Amarasinghe, A. A. T. (2020). A new species of Lankascincus Greer, 1991 (Reptilia: Scincidae) with an overview of the L. gansi group. Taprobanica, 9 (1): 103–119.
33. Kelaart, E. F. (1852). Prodromus faunae Zeylanicae, being contributions to the zoology of Ceylon. Dodsworth and Company, Colombo. 197+62 pp.
34. Kuhl, H. (1820). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Amphibien, In: Kuhl, H. (ed.), Beiträge zur Zoologie und Vergleichenden Anatomie. Hermannsche Buchhandlung, Frankfurt. pp. 75–132. [In German]
35. Peters, W. (1860). Über einiger interessante Amphibien, welche von dem durch seine zoologischen Schriften ruhmlichst bekannten österreichischen Naturforscher Professer Schmarda während seiner auf mehere Wettheile ausgedehnten, besonders auf wirbellose Thiere gerichteten, naturwissenchaftlichen Reise, mit deren Veröffentlichung Hr. Schmarda genenwärtig in Berlin beschäftigt ist, auf der Insel Ceylon gesammlet wurden. Monatsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, 1860: 182–186. [In German]
36. Sabaj Pérez, M. H. (2010). Standard symbolic codes for institutional resource collections in herpetology and ichthyology: an online reference. American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Washington, DC. Available from: http://www.asih.org (Accessed 10 January 2016).
37. Schneider, J. G. (1801). Historiae Amphibiorum naturalis et literariae. Fasciculus secundus continens Crocodilos, Scincos, Chamaesauras, Boas. Pseudoboas, Elapes, Angues. Amphisbaenas et Caecilias. Frommanni, Germany. 374 pp. [in Latin]
38. Sharma, R. C. (1969). Two new lizards of the genera Mabuya Fitzinger and Riopa Gray (Scincidae) from India. Bulletin of Systematic Zoology, Calcutta, 1 (2): 71–75.
39. Smith, M. A. (1935). Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma. Reptilia and Amphibia, 2, Sauria. Taylor and Francis, London. 440 pp.
40. Somaweera, R. and Somaweera, N. (2009). Lizards of Sri Lanka: A colour guide with field keys. Chimaira, Frankfurt. 303 pp.
41. Taylor, E. H. (1950). Ceylonese lizards of the family Scincidae. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 33 (13): 481–518.
42. Taylor, E. H. (1963). Lizards of Thailand. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 44 (14): 687–1077.
43. Taylor, E. H. and Elbel, R. E. (1958). Contributions to the herpetology of Thailand. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 38 (13): 1033–1089.
44. Wickramasinghe, L. J. M., Vidanapathirana, D. R. and Wickramasinghe, N. (2020). A new species of Lankascincus Greer, 1991 (Reptilia: Scincidae) from the Rakwana hills of Sri Lanka. Taprobanica, 9 (1): 23–30.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
| Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb