Volume 1, Issue 1 (9-2019)                   JAD 2019, 1(1): 26-33 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Gippoliti S. Conservation breeding programs and refined taxonomy as a political tool for biodiversity conservation: the de Beaux and Durrell legacies. JAD 2019; 1 (1) :26-33
URL: http://jad.lu.ac.ir/article-1-35-en.html
Società Italiana per la Storia della Fauna “G. Altobello”, Viale Liegi 48, 00198 Roma, Italy , spartacolobus@hotmail.com
Abstract:   (10397 Views)
Over the past decades, zoos and aquaria have shifted from an emphasis on ex situ conservation of animal species to strategies that emphasize educative and fund-raising efforts to halt environmental degradation ‘in situ’. However, it is here proposed that ‘ex situ’ breeding programs have a strong educative potential and if they are coupled with a fine-grain taxonomy based on phylogenetic thinking, they can be perceived as a strong ethical message against homogenization of global biodiversity to be directed at global, national and local levels.
Full-Text [PDF 329 kb]   (3600 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Research Article |
Received: 2019/05/16 | Accepted: 2019/08/22 | Published: 2019/09/30

References
1. Bauer, H., Mohammed, A. A., El Faki, A., Hiwytalla, K. O., Bedin, E., Rskay, G., Sitotaw, E. and Sillero-Zubiri, C. (2018). Antelopes of the Dinder-Alatash transboundary Protected Area, Sudan and Ethiopia. Gnusletter, 35 (1): 26–30.
2. Benazzo, A., Trucchi, E., Cahill, J. A., Delser, P. M., Mona, S., Fumagalli, M., Bunnefeld, L., Cornetti, L., Ghirotto, S., Girardi, M., Ometto, L., Panziera, A., Rota-Stabelli, O., Zanetti, E., Karamanlidis, A., Groff, C., Paule, L., Gentile, L., Vilà, C., Vicario, S., Boitani, L., Orlando, L., Fuselli, S., Vernesi, C., Shapiro, B., Ciucci, P. and Bertorelle, G. (2017). Survival and divergence in a small group: The extraordinary genomic history of the endangered Apennine brown bear stragglers. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114 (45): E9589–E9597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707279114 [DOI]
3. Brockington, D. and Scholfield, K. (2010). Expenditure by conservation nongovernmental organizations in sub-Saharan Africa. Conservation Letters, 3 (2): 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00094.x [DOI]
4. Ceballos, G., Ehrlich, P. R. and Dirzo, R. (2017). Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114 (30): E6089–E6096. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114 [DOI]
5. Chambers, S. M., Fain, S. R., Fazio, B. and Amaral, M. (2012). An account of the taxonomy of North American wolves from morphological and genetic analyses. North American Fauna, 77: 1–67. https://doi.org/10.3996/nafa.77.0001 [DOI]
6. Conde, D. A., Flesness, N., Colchero, F., Jones, O. R. and Scheuerlein, A. (2011). An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science, 331 (6023): 1390–1391. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200674 [DOI]
7. de Beaux, O. (1930). Etica Biologica. Tentativo di risveglio di una coscienza naturalistica. Temi, Trento. [in Italian]
8. de Beaux, O. (1932). Biological Ethics. An attempt to arouse a naturalistic conscience. The Italian Mail and Tribune, Firenze.
9. de Beaux, O. (1956). Posizione sistematica degli stambecchi e capre selvatiche viventi (Capra Linneo 1758) e loro distribuzione geografica. Atti Accademia Scienze e Lettere Genova, 12: 123–228.
10. Dolman, P. M., Collar, N. J., Scotland, K. M. and Burnside, R. J. (2015). Ark or park: the need to predict relative effectiveness of ex situ and in situ conservation before attempting captive breeding. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52 (4): 841–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/ 1365-2664.12449 [DOI]
11. Ellerman, J. R. and Morrison-Scott, T. C. S. (1951). Second edition. Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian mammals 1758 to 1946. British Museum (Natural History), London.
12. Geist, V. (2007). Defining subspecies, invalid taxonomic tools, and the fate of the woodland caribou. Rangifer, 27 (4): 25–28. https://doi.org/10.7557/2.27.4.315 [DOI]
13. Gervasi, V. and Ciucci, P. (2018). Demographic projections of the Apennine brown bear population Ursus arctos marsicanus (Mammalia: Ursidae) under alternative management scenarios. The European Zoological Journal, 85 (1): 242–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750263.2018.1478003 [DOI]
14. Gilbert, T., Gardner, R., Kraaijeveld, A. R. and Riordan, P. (2017). Contributions of zoos and aquariums to reintroductions: historical reintroduction efforts in the context of changing conservation perspectives. International Zoo Yearbook, 51 (1): 15–31. https://doi.org /10.1111/izy.12159 [DOI]
15. Gippoliti, S. (2006). Oscar de Beaux: a noteworthy Italian mammalogist and conservationist. Italian Journal of Zoology, 73 (3): 285–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/112 500006008 21361 [DOI]
16. Gippoliti, S. (2011). Zoos and conservation in the XXI Century: Overlooked meeting points between ecology and social sciences? Museologia Scientifica, 5 (1–2): 168–176.
17. Gippoliti, S. (2012). Ex situ conservation programmes in European Zoological Gardens: Can we afford to lose them? Biodiversity and Conservation, 21 (6): 1359–1364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0256-8 [DOI]
18. Gippoliti, S. (2016). Questioning current practice in brown bear, Ursus arctos, conservation in Europe that undervalues taxonomy. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 39.2: 199–205. https://doi.org/10.32800/abc.2016.39.0199 [DOI]
19. Gippoliti, S. (2017). On the taxonomy of Erythrocebus with a re-evaluation of Erythrocebus poliophaeus (Reichenbach, 1862) from the Blue Nile Region of Sudan and Ethiopia. Primate Conservation, 31: 53–59.
20. Gippoliti, S. (2019). Species delimitation in mammals: A comment on Zachos (2018). Mammalian Biology, 94: 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2018.05.007 [DOI]
21. Gippoliti, S. and Guacci, C. (2017). Il mammifero italiano più minacciato: l’Orso marsicano. Un approccio interdisciplinare per la sua conservazione. Natura e Montagna, 64 (2–3): 29–35. [in Italian]
22. Gippoliti, S., Lupták, P. and Groves, C. P. (2018). Flagship but only locally: bongo Tragelaphus eurycerus taxonomic history and its effects on current conservation policy. Gazella (Praha), 44: 65–77.
23. Groves, C. P., Cotterill, F. P. D., Gippoliti, S., Robovský, J., Roos, C., Taylor, P. J. and Zinner, D. (2017). Species definitions and conservation: a review and case studies from African mammals. Conservation Genetics, 18 (6): 1247–1256. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10592-017-0976-0 [DOI]
24. Guacci, C., Ferri, M. and Gippoliti, S. (2013). Un manifesto pro conservazione “ex situ” dell’orso bruno marsicano Ursus arctos marsicanus Altobello, 1921. Biologia Ambientale, 27 (2): 55–58. [In Italian]
25. Hedrick, P. W. and Fredrickson, R. J. (2008). Captive breeding and the reintroduction of Mexican and red wolves. Molecular Ecology, 17 (1): 344–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1365-294X.2007.03400.x [DOI]
26. Jones, C. G., Heck, W., Lewis, R. E., Mungroo, Y., Slade, G. and Cade, T. (1994). The restoration of the Mauritius kestrel Falco punctatus population. Ibis, 137 (1): 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1995.tb08439.x [DOI]
27. Kormos, R., Boesch, C., Bakarr, M. I., and Butynski, T. M. (2003). West African chimpanzees: Status survey and conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. ix + 219 pp.
28. Mallinson, J. J. C. (1991). Partnerships for conservation between zoos, local governments and non-governmental organizations. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 62: 57–74.
29. Marešová, J. and Frynta, D. (2008). Noah’s Ark is full of common species attractive to humans: the case of boid snakes in zoos. Ecological Economics, 64 (3): 554–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.012 [DOI]
30. Martin, T. E., Lurbiecki, H., Joy, J. B. and Mooers, A. O. (2014). Mammal and bird species held in zoos are less endemic and less threatened than their close relatives not held in zoos. Animal Conservation, 17 (2): 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12069 [DOI]
31. Meiri, S. and Mace, G. M. (2007). New taxonomy and the origin of species. PLOS Biology, 5 (7): e194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050194 [DOI]
32. Meloro, C., Guidarelli, G., Colangelo, P., Ciucci, P. and Loy, A. (2017). Mandible size and shape in extant Ursidae (Carnivora, Mammalia): A tool for taxonomy and ecogeography. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 55 (4): 269–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12171 [DOI]
33. O’Brien, S. J., Johnson, W. E., Driscoll, C. A., Dobrynin, P. and Marker, L. (2017). Conservation genetics of the cheetah: Lessons learned and new opportunities. Journal of Heredity, 108 (6): 671–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esx047 [DOI]
34. Page, J. (2018). Efforts to save woodland caribou in northern Quebec too costly, says province. CBC News, 9 March 2018.
35. Raposo, M. A., Stopiglia, R., Brito, G. R. R., Bockmann, F. A., Kirwan, G. M., Gayon, J. and Dubois, A. (2017). What really hampers taxonomy and conservation? A riposte to Garnett and Christidis. Zootaxa, 4317 (1): 179–184. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa .4317.1.10 [DOI]
36. Redford, K. H., Jensen, D. B. and Breheny, J. J. (2012). Integrating the captive and the wild. Science, 338 (6111): 1157–1158. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1228899 [DOI]
37. Reillo, P. (2002). Repatriation of mountain bongo to Kenya. Gnusletter, 21 (2): 11–15.
38. Snyder, N. F. R., Derrickson, S. C., Beissinger, S. R., Wiley, J. W., Smith, T. B., Toone, W. D. and Miller, B. (1996). Limitations of captive breeding in endangered species recovery. Conservation Biology, 10 (2): 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996. 10020338.x [DOI]
39. Thakur, M., Wullschleger Schättin, E. and McShea, W. J. (2018). Globally common, locally rare: revisiting disregarded genetic diversity for conservation planning of widespread species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27 (11): 3031–3035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1579-x [DOI]
40. Young, R. P., Hudson, M. A., Terry, A. M. R., Jones, C. G., Lewis, R. E., Tatayah, V., Zuël, N. and Butchart, S. H. M. (2014). Accounting for conservation: Using the IUCN Red List Index to evaluate the impact of a conservation organization. Biological Conservation, 180: 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.039 [DOI]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

  | Journal of Animal Diversity

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb